2 min read

Clarifying GovRAMP Review and Continuous Monitoring Processes

Clarifying GovRAMP Review and Continuous Monitoring Processes

To address recent confusion surrounding the GovRAMP Ready and Authorization review and continuous monitoring processes, we'd like to provide a clear and comprehensive explanation of what is shared and how these processes unfold. GovRAMP has been designed to bring clarity and efficiency to cloud security assessment and compliance, and understanding how it works is essential for both government entities and cloud service providers.

Review Process Overview

During the GovRAMP review process, documents such as the System Security Plan (see full list of documentation here) are required from the cloud service provider. These documents are then uploaded into a FedRAMP-moderate portal, where access is restricted to the GovRAMP Program Management Office (PMO). This controlled environment ensures the confidentiality and security of the documentation.

Government Access

Government entities have the option to request access to these documents. To do so, they must submit a request through a designated form. While the PMO will handle sharing the requests for access, all decision-making power as to whether to approve or deny the request lies with the service provider. Upon approval, government entities are granted viewer-access only. If the government entities do not access the portal within a year, they will be automatically removed. To maintain a streamlined and up-to-date process, it is the responsibility of government entities to promptly inform the GovRAMP staff if any individuals need to be removed from the access list. Providers do have an option to only share executive summary with government entities.  

Continuous Monitoring Process

The continuous monitoring process mirrors the review process. Providers are required to upload continuous monitoring scan results, inventory documentation, and Plan of Action and Milestones (POAM) documents. Then, the GovRAMP PMO prepares an executive summary. Government entities, once granted access, have the flexibility to access the entire documentation package or choose to review only the executive summary. This flexibility is designed to accommodate the specific needs of each government entity. What the government entity has access to is based on what was initially requested and approved through the request process. If an event should occur, there will be a proactive notification to governments who have been granted access, as outlined in our Continuous Monitoring Escalation Guide.

Sponsorship

For products under review with Authorization status, a government sponsor or review by the GovRAMP Approvals Committee is required. In either situation, the GovRAMP PMO does the validation and verification that the security package meets the GovRAMP requirements for Authorization. The government sponsor or Approvals Committee is then provisioned access to review the PMO’s Executive Summary and recommendation for status award.  Authorizing officials, in either case, receive access to the entire documentation package and continuous monitoring information. However, it's crucial to note that their access is limited to the duration of their determination process. Once they have made their decision, the PMO will migrate the documents out of the shared folder and into the archives, marking the completion of the sponsor's review. 

The same guidance applies to products going through the Fast Track Process as well, only they will submit their templates in FedRAMP formatting. This process is aimed at enhancing the efficiency and transparency of cloud procurement and compliance. It ensures that government entities and cloud service providers have clear guidelines and a standardized framework for evaluating cloud security. By offering clarity in shared access and detailed documentation requirements, GovRAMP strives to streamline and simplify cloud security assessments, making it a valuable resource for modernization and secure cloud adoption. 

Understanding Threats and Vulnerabilities in Government Cybersecurity

Understanding Threats and Vulnerabilities in Government Cybersecurity

In cybersecurity, especially in the public sector, clarity matters. Terms like “threat” and “vulnerability” are often used interchangeably, but they...

Read More
What Is Risk—And Why It Matters in Cybersecurity Risk Management for Government

What Is Risk—And Why It Matters in Cybersecurity Risk Management for Government

Risk isn’t just a technical concern. For both public and private sector organizations, it's a strategic consideration tied directly to trust,...

Read More
HRTec: Enabling Secure Government Infrastructure with GovRAMP

HRTec: Enabling Secure Government Infrastructure with GovRAMP

HRTec has long supported public sector organizations through its secure, scalable FedHIVE platform and Compliance as a Service model. As a GovRAMP...

Read More
Enhancing National Cybersecurity: 3 Key Strategies to Combat Cyber Threats

Enhancing National Cybersecurity: 3 Key Strategies to Combat Cyber Threats

The increasing frequency and severity of cyber threats has become a significant concern for our nation’s security. During the Keynote Panel at the...

Read More
Cloud Security Compliance Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Cloud Security Compliance Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

Securing cloud services and protecting consumer data is extremely important in today’s technology landscape. As more businesses rely on cloud...

Read More
GovRAMP's CJIS-Aligned Task Force: Advancing Framework Harmonization and Compliance

GovRAMP's CJIS-Aligned Task Force: Advancing Framework Harmonization and Compliance

In the realm of criminal justice management, compliance with the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) standards is essential and...

Read More